I've been doing a lot of thinking lately. Is it worth it to continue this project financially, or better to just save up for a complete certificated aircraft? Would I be better off stopping and focusing on progressing with my flying skills? Is this airplane even what my mission is now? Will my mission be the same in the future? Will there even be general aviation aircraft in the future? If general aviation, specifically recreational aviation is still around, will we be running Lycoming internal combustion engines? Electric motors? Hydrogen powered combustion? Autogas? New AvGas? Will aviation become so expensive that the only people who can afford to fly recreationally be the well to do and rich?
These are haunting questions when spending hours and hours literally making parts to be assembled. I can't answer it I suppose. Realistically, I spent more than 8 hours pondering these things. It's hard to put a time stamp on it, because whenever I had a minute away from work or stuff around the house, I was dreaming of these things, probably more like obsessing over it.
So let's start with this. How did I end up here back in 2019:
-Obviously I am a pilot and looking for an aircraft for pleasure flying. To my knowledge, without a fancy letter of agreement from the FAA, an Experimental aircraft cannot be used for hire. I considered instructing out of my own airplane once upon a time but this wouldn't really be feasible out of this plane. So this is for fun.
- I love operating out of grass strips, and adventuring with the airplane. I have often not gone places because the airstrip was outside my comfort envelope of the cessna 172 I fly, mostly in takeoff performance. So I want not necessarily a tried and true bush plane but one that operates out of unimproved surfaces. I love the idea of landing in fields, exploring, etc. In my flying career so far, I can count on one hand the number of times I have ventured into Class C airports, due mostly to the cost (landing fees?) and also to the hassle of clearances, etc.
- I am a airplane mechanic, a tinkerer, and a builder. I like the philosophy of "Built Not Bought". I work everyday other people's fancy Cirrus'; that's not me. I don't think I will ever have the money or permission from my other half to purchase a 500k+ composite machine like that. Right now, a 5 way split on a 172 is comfortable. Depending on engine choice, I think I can make at lease a Lycoming 360 powered version of this plane run about around my operating costs for the Bearhawk, hopefully a 540.
- I am an airplane mechanic - labor can be cheap. My time is getting less and less cheap, but at least if I want to do maintenance, I don't have to fork over $150 an hour for someone else to do it. I also have seen how planes are put together in my years as a mechanic and see how I would do things differently. Along the same line, certificated parts can be very expensive. Within reason, I plan to cut those costs. Don't get me wrong, I'm not doing anything unsafe like using non-aircraft grade bolts. But I'm welding up my own bellcrank, not paying Cessna $1500 for new old stock, or something crazy for avionics, or swtiches, or whatever else.
-I am a relatively big guy. Thankfully right now that mostly means the height way and not the width way, but a 150 just isn't going to cut it. I fell into a Citabria a few times, but felt somewhat cramped, although more in tune with the airplane (it felt like I became a part of it. A few friends of mine had a Maule M5 side by side, also cramped feeling. My best flying experiences (comfort wise) were in a 182. I felt like I had a very acceptable amount of head room, and elbow room. I also loved it's performance, just not the airframe's price tag. Or the stories of collapsing nose gear off (and on) airstrips.
- I have often wanted to take friends flying but couldn't because more than 2 people in a tired 1963 skyhawk would require takeoff with minimal fuel to be comfortable. 4 souls aboard seems unobtainable, at least in today's world . A true 4 place would be nice, and the added benefit that things could be opened up for gear (camping, bikes, whatever).
- While I want to get my instrument rating, IMC in a single engine airplane sounds like something to avoid. In fact, the more I poke around and quiz pilots, the more I find that without an autopilot system and a plane designed for it, once you get your rating, you spend the rest of your flying career trying to avoid using it. Use it to punch through stratus layers on a scuddy day, sure. Options to get home when the clouds are low, sure. Go takeoff in the dead of winter in a snowstorm or go dancing around thunderstorms, probably not. Let's not forget maintaining proficiency, hard to do on 40 hours of flying a year.
- Knowing what I know about the industry, seeing where things are going, general aviation is about to have some big changes. Fuel sources, among other things, will be hot topics. Certificated aircraft will take forever to retrofit when that day comes - shoot, the FAA is still stuck in the 90s. Experimental offers a bit more freedom, albeit a lot more mental gymnastics to do it yourself.